Collective detection +
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
Sound studies +
Brooklyn
It's like a trifecta of obsession for me. https://t.co/PLckuhwpDi
Welcome to the resistance, such as it is. Also I’m here to tell you there is life after Insta, though it’s a little more boring.
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
In 1884, Lydia R Payne got a marriage license in West Virginia to marry her longtime female companion Sarah Hinton. Later Payne changed her sex to male. Fascinating account of an archival discovery from @LibraryofVA
— Rachel Hope Cleves (@RachelCleves) November 19, 2018
#histsex #LGBTQ #twitterstorians https://t.co/Kc2cKMaGa3
When I was 16, I went to a print shop and ordered some personalized business cards. They read:
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
Aram Sinnreich
Late Riser
"Get It While You Can"
The Brazillian, Singaporean and Latvian Parliaments have now joined us in the call for Mark Zuckerberg to give evidence to ‘International Grand Committee’ on Disinformation and ‘fake news’ on 27th November. Read our joint letter to @facebook here >>https://t.co/IG83pFtnnz
— Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (@CommonsCMS) November 19, 2018
Yes, absolutely he has. And there's no question in my mind that he's dog whistling and bullhorning to his white supremacist base. But I'm specifically wondering whether he's used the term "International Finance Jews" in his rhetoric as you suggest. If so, please link. Thanks.
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
Can you please provide a link to the footage or reportage in which he used the term "International Finance Jews"? Thanks.
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
Important new work from @EmmaLBriant connects the dots on #TrumpRussia #Brexit #CambridgeAnalytica https://t.co/duN3XivhAU
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
BUT rankings do matter. More and more. Even if they’re based on semi-bogus metrics. Rankings attract funding, which attracts good faculty, which attracts more students, which brings in more money. So expect those Chinese Nobel Prize figures to rise in the coming years.
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018
This is true, and Chinese universities are notorious for privileging citation count above all other considerations (and, in many cases, juicing citation count because of these incentives), which makes citation a very poor index of intellectual success. 1/2 https://t.co/Ezs4ePAl5F
— Journalists, Immigrants & Art Make Us Great 💻🗽🖼 (@aram) November 19, 2018